Jump to content

The Great Lakes disappearing act


rick

Recommended Posts

As all five shrink at an alarming pace,

some people have begun to fear global warming is the culprit

MARTIN MITTELSTAEDT

From Monday's Globe and Mail

September 24, 2007 at 3:02 AM EDT

The Great Lakes, so named because of their immense size and prodigious water content, aren't as great as they used to be.

Government forecasters are projecting that Lake Superior, the largest of the five, will fall to its lowest level for September since modern recordkeeping began nearly a century ago. The amount flowing out of the lake at its outlet, the St. Mary's River, has plunged too, and would have to rise by a staggering 50 per cent to reach the average of the past century.

Levels on Lakes Michigan and Huron are also sagging, Ontario is down, as is Erie – although the latter, the smallest by volume, has been the least affected.

What's going on? While there is no scientific certainty about what's ailing the Great Lakes – which together form the world's largest interconnected body of fresh water – some fear global warming is at work, causing them to shrink.

For Michigan and Huron, there is an added concern: Human meddling may have made them spring what amounts to a giant leak. Environmentalists contend that decades-ago dredging near Sarnia is causing them to lose an enormous amount of water – estimated at about an extra 10 billion litres a day, or enough to fill 4,000 Olympic-size pools.

The falling water levels aren't news to Gary Vent, whose home overlooks Georgian Bay, an arm of Lake Huron, near Waubaushene, Ont. He can see the effects: The shoreline that used to be 50 metres from his house is now more than 150 metres. Newly emerging land from the drying lakebed means that, where he docked his boat just six years ago, he now plays golf.

“You can hit a solid seven iron,” he says. “I've got a golf course now instead of a place to park my boat.”

Water levels on the Great Lakes go through seasonal fluctuations driven by the flow and ebb of the spring snow melt. They also experience lengthy – perhaps as long as 30 years – alternating cycles of high and low readings that occur for unknown reasons and can cause levels to vary by a metre or even more over the years.

The lakes contain about one-fifth of all the fresh water on the planet. Although a drop of a metre may not seem like much compared to what they contain, about 99 per cent of the lake water is considered a legacy of the last ice age and is basically non-renewable.

Only about 1 per cent is replenished each year through precipitation, and has to offset what flows out of the lakes through the St. Lawrence River into the Atlantic Ocean. And while the lakes are big, they're not limitless. Except for Superior, their average depth is less than 100 metres (compared to oceans that plunge more than 3,000 metres.)

The lakes are now in the midst of one of their periodic down cycles. But this one seems much more extreme than usual, lasting for nearly a decade – prompting questions about global warming.

Computer model projections generally show that the lakes will shrink as climate changes cause air temperatures around them to rise. Not only will the lakes themselves become warmer, leading them to lose more water to evaporation, but the land is likely to become drier, reducing the supply of groundwater to streams that feed the lakes.

At this point, global warming is speculation, but Mary Muter thinks she has another explanation for why things are worse this time, at least for Lakes Michigan and Huron, which are joined at their northern tips and consequently have the same water level.

Ms. Muter, head of the environment committee for the Georgian Bay Association, is advancing a controversial theory that the two lakes are inadvertently being drained because of the effects of dredging on the St. Clair River in the early 1960s.

She believes dredging has made the river bed more susceptible to erosion, which over time has deepened it, and caused more water to flow into Lake Erie. “The drain hole is getting bigger,” she says.

In 2005, the group commissioned a study that estimated the erosion had caused an extra daily outflow of about 3.2 billion litres. An update issued last month, using more recent estimates on lake levels, upped the figure to 10 billion litres, leading to concerns that the ecological integrity of the lakes was being damaged. Since 1970, the extra drainage has lowered the levels of the lakes by an estimated 60 centimetres, the group says.

The International Joint Commission, the organization that oversees the lakes for the Canadian and U.S. governments, has announced that it will study water levels on Lakes Superior, Michigan and Huron, but it isn't expected to report its findings on the giant leak for another three years.

Ms. Muter says the problem could easily be fixed by piling large boulders into vulnerable parts of the riverbed to shore it up, something she says should be done right away, given that most of the water draining away is a non-renewable resource.

“I consider it bordering on immoral to not address this,” she says. “How much longer are we going to wait to do the right thing?”

Environment Canada wants to see what the IJC concludes before considering mitigation measures. “We'll be looking to see what they find out in their study to see if [riverbed erosion] is a primary factor or whether it's a secondary factor or no factor in the change in levels that's occurring,” says Ralph Moulton, a senior engineer at Environment Canada.

Lake Superior is also undergoing travails. It's experienced below-average water levels for nearly 10 years, the longest period of below-average readings on record. Mr. Moulton says the lake is “almost certainly” going to set a new record for the lowest September, eclipsing the previous low-water mark set in 1926, probably by a few centimetres.

Lake Superior levels are being driven down in part by a lack of rain in the area it drains. Last year, precipitation was at its lowest since the mid-1920s.

But another worrisome development is that Superior has been getting warmer, a reflection of higher air temperatures around the lake. According to a study by University of Minnesota researchers released this year, summer water temperatures rose about 2.5 degrees from 1979 to 2006.

There is no mistaking the warming – the lake has less ice cover in winter. And with Superior not freezing over as much, more of its water is being lost to evaporation.

Meanwhile, Lake Ontario is about a fifth of a metre below its average level, and Lake Erie is down by a little more than a tenth of a metre.

Mr. Moulton says Environment Canada modelling indicates that under all the scenarios used, global warming will cause water levels to drop, possibly by as much as 1.2 metres by 2050, although he also says these simulations show precipitation will rise, which hasn't occurred.

Whether global warming is beginning to dry out the lakes, he says, “is the $64,000 question.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest canadadude

Interesting read and I've really noticed the low water at Port D and our lake has been the least affected of all !! :unsure::(......Lakeside beach is huge right now stretching at least 100' more into the lake then normal :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest canadadude
Gee, didn't someone warn about this some 20 years back? At least we will get big sandy beaches on this side of the lake as a trade-off :unsure::(

The beaches would be great.....if only we could clean up the sewer we dump in there, we may even be able to use them :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The beaches would be great.....if only we could clean up the sewer we dump in there, we may even be able to use them :unsure:

You wouldn't happen to be referring to that outdated excuse for a treatment plant at Lock 1? :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest canadadude
You wouldn't happen to be referring to that outdated excuse for a treatment plant at Lock 1? :(

lock1 and Dalhousie I can take you to a few spots between Port D and Port Weller where the street water just flows right into the lakes :unsure::unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest canadadude

Well Joe in a way your absolutly right but municipalities are under a sorta a time frame to get the infrastructure right and are given a whole lota leeway on either side, so to acctually achieve this goal in a political time frame,....... in other words if we you got the money and can do it we will, if not oh well it's just the lake :unsure::unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Joe in a way your absolutly right but municipalities are under a sorta a time frame to get the infrastructure right and are given a whole lota leeway on either side, so to acctually achieve this goal in a political time frame,....... in other words if we you got the money and can do it we will, if not oh well it's just the lake :angry2::(

The only water that has to be treated is sewage. Storm runoff does not have to be treated. Some of the older plants have limited capacities and have pumped the raw excees into the lake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
:) Not to rub this in at all.BUT did you all not remember the post that I made last year on an artical stating that the U.S. was taking water from lake Ontario to change the water in there resivours because it is polluted. The report also stated that Canada could do nothing about it because the U.S said they can do what they want with the water on the U.S. side of the lake. At this time the Canadian big wigs were trying to pass a law that you can not use Canadian water to sell or replentish polluted water, outside of the lake and the U.S. replied (untill this law goes threw we will use this water for what we want) Now the big ????? is what happened to the law :) Oh I know the FIBERALS FOLDED can't mess with the U.S.A. we need them so they can have our clean water so they can protect us. Now this sounds a little better of the truth than global warming right. It just points the finger in a differant direction and we beleive it because they say so. :) Now here is the biggie the only ones that were going to bring this out in the open were the conservitives but we all know how that worked out :P It will take a few more years of the water disapering and the lies about global warming before We as Canadians stand up and speak out :lol::lol::lol: OH WAIT whats the saying( I'M CANADIAN OH WELL)you can have our water MR. AMERICA IT'S OK. this is BULLS#%*& but it is all our faults and there aint a thing we can do about it now so LIVE WITH IT SUCKERS and quit your whining or we will have to order 10 tones of cheeze from the great U.S OF A$$&*%$#&. And you heard it from me again. :):D:)Catfish
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it a little hard to believe that taking water for resivours would make a lake of that size drop as much as it has. That's a big freakin lake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it a little hard to believe that taking water for resivours would make a lake of that size drop as much as it has. That's a big freakin lake.
:dunno: Yes you are right Rick but they have been doing it for years. I am sure that global warming is also having an effect but the big pic is trying to keep it hush hush so Canadians don't start a war over water. :lol::lol::blush: Rob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes you are right Rick but they have been doing it for years.

If it was a gradual drop over many years then I could see it, but two feet in the past twelve months? The reservoir story just doesn't hold water. :blink::angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen so many reports on dredging rivers and such but what people aren't understanding is that it's not coming from the south but the north, but I can't figure out how, but that's what their claiming.

The only way I can see this is by mass, the icebergs taking up more space. As we all know water expands when it freezes :angry::blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back in the 70's the news was filled with headlines about high water levels on L Erie. Houses and cottages were being washed away by the higher water levels. There is a fluctuation over decades that has always existed.

This apparently is a new record low, but will it average out in another 30 years?

Remember also that there are twice as many people drawing on our fresh water supply.Twice as much drinking water, industrial use. More than double the hydro-electric demand. How much before we exceed the Great Lakes ability to replenish itself. The drainage basin is relatively small.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing to consider is this one simple rule. Natural elements have a finite quantity. There is only so much fresh water, air and nitrogen. We consume more as populations grow. We cannot produce more water, oxygen, nitrogen or any other natural element on the face of the earth. The more we use, tie up or waste, the less there is to recirculate and re-use. If man exceeds the supply, nature will try to restore the balance in a very impartial and brutal manner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...