Jump to content

Sturgeons' strange behavior at Bonneville Dam surprises biologists


Recommended Posts

Sturgeons' strange behavior at Bonneville Dam surprises biologists

Posted by Michael Milstein, The Oregonian May 15, 2008 19:37PM

When sonar surveys spotted a vast pile of rubble in the Columbia River below Bonneville Dam late last winter, officials suddenly worried part of the dam structure was eroding into the river.

U.S. Army Corps of EngineersThousands of sturgeon - some 14 feet long - mass below Bonneville Dam in this video frame from a remotely operated submersible sent down to investigate what was first thought to be a pile of rubble. The "Mighty 86th Beavers" on the screen refers to the Army dive team operating the submersible, and the number 55.2 is the water depth in feet.

"Everybody said, 'Oh my gosh, we need to get divers out there right away,'" recalled Dennis Schwartz, a fisheries biologist with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which oversees the dam.

What they found below the spillways in February was not a giant pile of rock at all, but a humongous pile of thousands upon thousands of sturgeon - some of them 14 feet long or longer - lounging together in frigid water at the bottom of the river.

"We call it the big sturgeon ball," Schwartz said.

The mountain of white sturgeon contained around 60,000 fish, according to a crude estimate by Michael Parsley, a research fisheries biologist with the U.S. Geological Survey's Columbia River Research Laboratory in Cook, Wash. He described that estimate as "probably conservative."

It was an aquatic phenomenon nobody had ever seen at such a monstrous scale, offering a startling glimpse into the life of the Columbia's largest and most ancient fish.

If the estimates are anywhere near correct, the congregation of sturgeon may represent 5 to 10 percent of all the white sturgeon in the lower Columbia River, Parsley said. The conclave apparently broke up in March as the Corps increased water releases through the dam to help salmon, Schwartz said.

An Army dive team called out to inspect the dam discovered the sturgeon when it sent down a remotely operated submersible to take a look at what everyone thought was debris.

The lingering question: What were all the fish doing there?

"Normally they're pretty spread out," Schwartz said. "You don't see this balling behavior."

On videos recorded by the underwater camera, the fish appear to be lounging, many on top of each other, some even upside down, at depths of 40 to 50 feet. Biologists considered whether the fish may be putting up an organized defense against sea lions showing up increased numbers to gobble salmon and sturgeon below the dam.

They discovered the sturgeon ball just as sea lions started to show up, but they also point out that sturgeon have been known to gather -- though in lower numbers -- in other places where there are no sea lions.

"The correlation (with sea lions) would probably be pretty weak," Schwartz said. "They all seemed to be just hanging out together."

Similar winter gatherings of sturgeon have been documented far up the Columbia in Canada, but not at the tremendous numbers seen below Bonneville, Parsley said. Biologists are not sure why the fish collect that way.

"We don't know whether that one aggregation is in response to sea lions being there, or if they do this every year," he said.

The fish may bunch up for safety as they conserve energy during the cool months of winter, he said. The water was about 34 to 35 degrees.

"They were just lollygagging -- definitely not expending energy," he said. "There must be some social or survival advantage to it, but I'm not sure what it is."

Sturgeon are ancient survivors that have changed little since the time of the dinosaurs. They can weigh more than 1,500 pounds and live to be well over 100 years old.

Biologists have heard reports of congregations of sturgeon at the surface of reservoirs and rivers, including shallow parts of the Columbia. But there aren't very good estimates on how many sturgeon may be involved in those gatherings, Parsley said. "Sturgeons in general seem to be relatively social."

He heard an account from a woman who said the river came alive with fish. She told him she couldn't help but think of sharks when she saw the giant fish slice across the water surface.

Teams working at the dam have reported some unusual sturgeon activity since sea lions began appearing in larger numbers at the dam each spring in recent years, eating both salmon and sturgeon. Last year, for instance, crews saw large numbers of sturgeon along the bank of Cascades Island, one of the islands just below the dam.

Biologists speculated that the fish might have been trying to avoid sea lions, said Robert Stansell, a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers biologist at the dam.

Sea lions -- mainly protected Steller sea lions -- were spotted gobbling more than 600 sturgeon this year, although the number dropped off later in the spring, he said. Hundreds of sturgeon also were found in the dam's fish ladder last winter, which was unusual, he said.

Parsley said sturgeon are so poorly studied that biologists don't know much about their behavior. Big gatherings of the fish in the depths of the river may be more common than anyone realizes.

"I firmly believe they do this elsewhere in the river," he said.

While salmon are well known, biologists have spent far less time mapping the populations and habits of sturgeon. But the fish are by far the largest and longest lived fish in the river system -- and one of the most mysterious.

"They're the woolly mammoth, the saber-tooth tiger or the lion of the Columbia River," Parsley said. "There's just still a lot to be learned about them."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a link for this Dan? I'd love to see any video footage.

Just think if it weren't for the dam those fish might have spawned up stream. They're being considered for the Sara List.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if the Sara list would be all that appropraite...there are probably way more sturgeon than any one thinks.

I remember ready articles before in different wildlife magazines saying that most research is only accredited to diver sightings, that's mostly where they get all thier info, I saw a map once showing places they do this on the Niagara River, and it marked spots that the where sighted. This also went on to say how hard this was to do because of the force of the river,there are only so many spots where safe dives like that can be conducted. it also went on to say that they don't have much data as far as spawning patterns and stuff go either. There are probably more than we think in the river...no one really targets them because it has always been a closed season, so you don't really hear of people getting out there and bringing out the big gear and baits for fishing them..we hear off the odd incidental catch. Who knows, it's all a big mystery like some aspects of musky fishing....I bet not too many people have seen little tiny muskies in big numbers any where either...as a matter of fact I have only ever caught like 3 really small snot rocket sized ones ever, all the rest have been big. So they must have some pretty good hiding spots as well, I have also seen articles on this as well pertaining to our area here on the Niagara River, and once seen in a magazine a map marked out for the upper and lower Niagara where some musky "hot spots" where and lots of that info came from divers as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was very interesting Dan.......there is a lot we don't yet know about creatures that have been around this earth for millions of years . Since they are bottom feeders , I'm surprised they can survive in waters that may have a lot of contamination settled on the bottom . The Niagara River prob.washes most chemicals away with the fast current to settle on the floor of L.Ontario . Why these fish stack up like cord wood and away from the bottom where they feed is a mystery . Where are you J.Cousteau when we need you ? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...